Residential construction quality and production levels in Taiwan

Hsieh, H Y and Forster, J (2006) Residential construction quality and production levels in Taiwan. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 13(5), pp. 502-520. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose - The aim of this article is to present a new, simple applicable method of inferring and assessing residential construction quality at an industry-wide level. Design/methodology/approach - Construction quality is measured using ratios of structural materials to production levels. Cement and reinforcing bar per 1,000m2 of residential floor space are the metrics, especially appropriate in Taiwan as new dwelling units (virtually all apartments and row houses) and all of reinforced concrete. Complementary measurements of quality for labour and non-structural construction material inputs were also made. Findings - The structural input and complementary measures indicate that the quality of Taiwanese residential construction declines dramatically and consistently at higher production levels. The implication is that dwelling units from the 1990s construction boom are especially at risk. Research limitations/implications - The methods cannot be used to identify specific buildings at risk. The methods are difficult to apply in situations where construction methods and residential types are heterogeneous. Practical implications - Construction quality can be monitored on a regular basis so industry-wide steps can be taken if quality declines appear. The evidence is consistent with Taiwan's sub-contractor network enabling rapid expansions and contractions at the expense of hidden quality failure. Originality/value - This paper provides information that could lead to much firmer regulatory systems, hence has the potential to help save lives and property.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction industry; earthquakes; planning and control; production methods; Taiwan
Index terms: earthquake, construction material, residential construction, construction industry, methodology, reinforced concrete, sub-contractor, evidence, construction quality, Taiwan, regulatory system, construction method
Subjects: quality assurance, environmental hazards, political science, industry analysis, building construction, Geography, construction integration, research methods, building materials, practitioner, evaluation and assessment methods
Topics: Geographical Context, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Governance, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here