Ingirige, B and Sexton, M (2006) Alliances in construction: Investigating initiatives and barriers for long-term collaboration. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 13(5), pp. 521-535. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - This paper aims to prove that alliances in the construction industry can be used as vehicles to achieve sustainable competitive advantage. Design/methodology/approach - The paper first sets out a theoretical proposition through a literature review and synthesis, then details an empirical case study in the construction industry to investigate the theoretical proposition. Findings - The findings indicate the existence of the "project based mindset", within the working practices of the different players in construction alliances. This overly narrow project focus constrains the process of achieving sustainable competitive advantage for alliances. Research limitations/implications - This research, in broad terms, provides insights on the value of long-term orientated collaboration in construction alliances and specifically target practitioners by identifying benefits of balancing alliance tasks and activities among senior executives and project managers in an appropriate way. Originality/value - The paper makes an original contribution to the general body of knowledge on alliances and specifically to construction alliances by identifying the core value addition in the process of long-term orientated collaboration so that the processes are carefully designed, interpreted and nurtured in practice. Also, recommends initiatives by the alliance management to redesign tasks and activities such that collaboration becomes part-and-parcel of senior executives and project managers' daily routine, rather than considering collaborative encounters as extra activities that need "slack" time.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | culture; earthquakes; management strategy; partnership; strategic alliances |
| Index terms: | case study, project manager, competitive advantage, management strategy, partnership, strategic alliance, working practice, earthquake, redesign, construction industry, routine, mindset, senior executive, slack, literature review, practitioner, collaboration, methodology, body of knowledge |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, knowledge management, operations research, practitioner, design methods, health behaviours and lifestyles, data collection methods, profession, environmental hazards, leadership, industry analysis, sociology, partnership management, market analysis, research methods, management |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Design Practice, Human Resources, Organizational Design, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here