Jeong, K S; Kagioglou, M; Haigh, R; Amaratunga, D and Siriwardena, M L (2006) Embedding good practice sharing within process improvement. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 13(1), pp. 62-81. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - Construction firms need to improve the way in which they manage their processes. Focusing on good practice and knowledge sharing within and across organisational boundaries, the purpose of this paper is to discuss recent developments on a structured process improvement model developed for construction enterprises (SPICE). Design/methodology/approach - A multiple holistic case study approach was taken to develop and test the presented process improvement model at a firm's level. To compare and synthesise different perspectives, respondents were selected from across a vertical cross-section of the case study organisations. A combination of several research techniques employed for triangulation. Findings - Provides a set of key processes to establish an essential managerial infrastructure for achieving organisation-wide process improvement. The results highlight the need to implement the key processes in an integrated and holistic manner. Research limitations/implications - Key limitations of the presented process improvement model are closely related to the concerns raised against "process thinking." More case studies are required to confirm or refute generalisability of the findings. Practical implications - Firms need to appreciate diverse perspectives and consider norms and values of people in order to understand and improve their process capabilities in a balanced manner. Continuous diagnosis and adaptation of organisational process capability to the changing environment are required to ensure achieving sustainable competitive advantage. Originality/value - This paper contributes to the process and knowledge management/organisational learning literature. It also highlights several important issues to address wider aspects of organisational process improvement, as well as future research direction.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction works; knowledge sharing; process analysis; process planning |
| Index terms: | process improvement, organizational learning, construction firm, knowledge sharing, methodology, norms, boundaries, triangulation, knowledge management, competitive advantage, case study, adaptation, good practice, process analysis, construction work |
| Subjects: | operations management, knowledge management, property law, data collection methods, user focus, research design and methodology, organization, market analysis, sociology, management, performance measurement, research methods, professional development |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Design Practice, Quality Management, Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here