Kehinde, J O and Mosaku, T O (2006) An empirical study of assets structure of building construction contractors in Nigeria. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 13(6), pp. 634-644. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - The paper aims to report the research findings on the assets structure of medium-sized building construction contracting firms in Nigeria and its implications on their operation. Design/methodology/approach - The survey approach was adopted for the study. Two sets of data were collected: secondary source data from audited financial statements and primary source data using a structured questionnaire administered to management personnel of contracting firms. Descriptive statistical analysis and ratio analysis were employed for data analysis. Findings - The results show that the assets structure of these firms comprise of fixed assets being less than half of the total assets, which imply that a greater portion of the total assets is current assets (held mainly as account receivables that sometimes may not be available within one year). There is generally a low investment in fixed assets from earnings over the years. The assets structure of these firms could impact on their ability to compete successfully on some project types especially where hiring options for plant and equipment are unavailable. Originality/value - The research provides information on the assets structure of the medium-sized building construction contractors in Nigeria. The study points to the need for adoption of a more proactive approach by building contractors in the face of a fluctuating workload.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | assets; construction industry; fixed assets; Nigeria |
| Index terms: | building contractor, statistical analysis, Nigeria, ratio analysis, fixed assets, empirical study, option, plant and equipment, construction industry, data analysis, personnel, survey, workload, building construction, face, questionnaire, methodology |
| Subjects: | asset management, decision analysis, building construction, industry analysis, research methods, management, manufacturing engineering, Geography, psychology, economic analysis, data analysis and analytics, data science, data collection methods, practitioner |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here