Sandhu, M and Helo, P (2006) A network approach to project business analysis. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 13(6), pp. 600-615. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - Based upon previous models and the extant literature, the purpose of this paper is to present a network approach to describing and analyzing inter-organizational relationships in project business. The framework provides a better understanding of the dynamic processes and critical interfaces in a network context, and advocates the use of the tools of agile supply-demand networks (ASDN) and design structure matrix (DSM). Design/methodology/approach - This conceptual paper uses a network approach to understand inter-organizational business relationships in resource management. This approach is useful for understanding relationships in project business, which usually involves a wide array of actors or stakeholders who provide resources or have an interest in project outcomes. Findings - The paper concludes that a network-based framework provides a solid basis for a rich description and analysis of a multi-actor project business, as well as assisting in understanding important interpersonal relationship factors that affect project success-such as trust, commitment, and adaptation. Research limitations/ implications - Models of the type discussed here have been implemented in larger multinational corporations, but they might not be applicable in smaller enterprises that do not have overall control of a network. Practical implications - The paper presents useful practical tools for understanding the dynamic processes of networks in project-based business, and for identifying the actors, activities and resource interdependencies involved. Originality/value - This paper extends upon previous approaches to project business and presents practical tools that can be used to analyze project-business networks.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | matrix organizations; networking; supply and demand |
| Index terms: | design structure matrix, networking, commitment, business analysis, methodology, adaptation, project outcome, business relationship, project success, supply and demand, resource management, interpersonal relationship |
| Subjects: | communication, psychology, design methods, control systems, strategic management, user focus, project completion, financial analysis, behavioral psychology, market analysis, project management theory and practice, research methods |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here