Walsh, K D; Sawhney, A and Vachris, M A (2006) Improving inter-spatial comparison of construction costs. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 13(2), pp. 123-135. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to compare construction costs between nations, which is an important part of international economic statistics. Methods employed for these comparisons to date have yielded questionable results. The paper presents a summary of the problem and the results of proof-of-concept testing for a new method. Design/methodology/approach – Prices were estimated for a simple basket of two construction components using cost-estimating guides for several nations. Both developed and developing nations were included. The prices were obtained for the components installed in the field, including labor, equipment, and materials. Purchasing power parities (PPPs) were calculated from the baskets. Findings – The results indicate that the basket of construction components approach provides construction sector results much more in keeping with the overall consumption PPPs for the countries tested. This result suggests that the values obtained from this method provide a reasonable measure of construction price differentials. The method also requires substantially fewer resources than previous project-based approaches. Originality/value – Because the construction sector represents a significant fraction of global economic activity, it is important to incorporate this sector into the overall process accurately. The construction sector is difficult to compare, but ironically is often a large share of economic activity in developing countries, where comparison is most important. This paper presents a potential solution to a vexing problem in construction econometrics.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; costs; estimation; purchasing power |
| Index terms: | methodology, estimating, consumption, construction sector, developing country, developing nation, economic statistics, testing, construction industry, econometric, economic activity, estimation, purchasing, construction cost |
| Subjects: | development economics, research methods, procurement strategy, industry analysis, quantitative and statistical methods, consumer economics, professional practice, financial and cost management, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Business Strategy, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here