Wu, S; Clements-Croome, D; Fairey, V; Albany, B; Sidhu, J; Desmond, D and Neale, K (2006) Reliability in the whole life cycle of building systems. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 13(2), pp. 136-153. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this research is to show that reliability analysis and its implementation will lead to an improved whole life performance of the building systems, and hence their life cycle costs (LCC). Design/methodology/approach - This paper analyses reliability impacts on the whole life cycle of building systems, and reviews the up-to-date approaches adopted in UK construction, based on questionnaires designed to investigate the use of reliability within the industry. Findings - Approaches to reliability design and maintainability design have been introduced from the operating environment level, system structural level and component level, and a scheduled maintenance logic tree is modified based on the model developed by Pride. Different stages of the whole life cycle of building services systems, reliability-associated factors should be considered to ensure the system's whole life performance. It is suggested that data analysis should be applied in reliability design, maintainability design, and maintenance policy development. Originality/value - The paper presents important factors in different stages of the whole life cycle of the systems, and reliability and maintainability design approaches which can be helpful for building services system designers. The survey from the questionnaires provides the designers with understanding of key impacting factors.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; design; life cycle costs; maintenance programmes; reliability management; United Kingdom |
| Index terms: | questionnaire, methodology, data analysis, maintainability, programme, life cycle cost, survey, United Kingdom, building system, construction industry, implementation, whole life cycle, reliability analysis, building service, designer |
| Subjects: | sustainability assessment, maintenance engineering, research methods, Geography, project controls, industry analysis, data collection methods, profession, engineering systems, reliability engineering, contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Time Control, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Procurement, Sustainability, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here