Collaborative relationships in construction: The UK contractors' perception

Akintoye, A and Main, J (2007) Collaborative relationships in construction: The UK contractors' perception. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 14(6), pp. 597-617. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to describe UK contractors' perceptions of collaborative relationships in construction. Design/methodology/ approach - Based on a UK wide postal questionnaire survey, the opinions of contractors were assessed on reasons for collaborative relationships and the factors that are responsible for the success and failure of collaborative relationships in construction development. The respondents were split into two groups (SME's and large) based on their number of employees, to determine whether their responses varied with size as part of the analysis. Statistical analyses, based on Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and factor analysis technique were used to investigate the cluster of relationships. Findings - The research shows that UK contractors are positive about collaboration and are engaged in collaborative relationships for construction developments. Factor analysis shows that the principal reasons why contractors are involved in collaborative relationships are for risk sharing, access to innovation and technology, response to market, resource efficiency and client requirements. The principal success factors are commitment of adequate resources from the partners, equity of relationship, recognition of the importance of non-financial benefits and clarity of objectives while the principal failure factors are lack of trust and consolation and lack of experience and business fit. Practical implications - Drawing from the findings, the study confirms that construction collaborative relationships are customer driven with very little consideration for competitors, suppliers and subcontractors although a a true collaborative relationship should take into account all the parties involved in construction development supply and demand chains to reap the full benefits. Originality/value - The paper makes an original contribution of exploring the area of relationships in construction in the UK from the contractors point-of-view. The contents within the paper will be of interest to those working within the field.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: critical success factors; factor analysis; partnership; strategic alliances; supplier relations; United Kingdom
Index terms: construction development, factor analysis, client requirements, resource efficiency, statistical analysis, strategic alliance, partnership, supply and demand, variance, subcontractor, critical success factor, questionnaire, collaboration, methodology, survey, success factor, commitment, drawing, United Kingdom, failure factor
Subjects: statistical analysis, partnership management, market analysis, measurement and scaling, production management, Geography, professional development, management, research methods, data science, health monitoring assessment and metrics, psychology, technical documentation, practitioner, control systems, data collection methods, risk assessment
Topics: Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Design Practice, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here