Beran, V and Dlask, P (2007) Nonlinear optimisation and rational cash flow. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 14(3), pp. 277-292. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - The problem of diverse cash flows associated with a construction "project" appear in four progressive cycles. These are the initiating construction cycle and closing deconstruction cycle (devaluation cycle). The effectiveness of any project is given by capitalisation cycle. The optimisation of payback (credit return) cycle is critical for any project. Design/methodology/approach - For calculate of activity durations, cash flows and even we may use the spreadsheet table as a tool for expression of calculation formulas. This approach may offer a mechanism for answers regarding the sensitivity of manageable parameters (say changes in costs, construction speeds, duration of activity). The problem of optimal capacity expansion of construction work as a time dependent problem is studied in many different applied contexts. Traditional capacity planning usually begins with a forecast of demand on the basis of organisational or technological needs. Findings - The implementation of a technical project carried out in conditions of high production speeds and low time reserves requires changes in technologies, organisation and preparation of construction. In each specific case, a civil engineer needs to know the economic impacts (the capability of applicable calculations). Originality/value - It is obvious from the given example, which has the same features as the execution of a series of construction projects in recent years, that the myth of the importance of executing works in large volumes ahead of the deadlines has significant financial consequences.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cash budget; optimization techniques; productivity rate; property management; spreadsheet programs |
| Index terms: | payback, economic impact, program, construction project, methodology, cash flow, civil engineer, construction work, effectiveness, property management, duration, implementation, optimization technique, spreadsheet, productivity |
| Subjects: | profession, economic analysis, contractual arrangements, data science, real estate economics, operations management, production management, performance management, research methods, algorithms, software systems, management, financial management, financial analysis, project controls |
| Topics: | Procurement, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Time Control, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here