Plant managers' perceptions of plant security systems

Carmichael, R; Edwards, D J and Holt, G D (2007) Plant managers' perceptions of plant security systems. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 14(1), pp. 65-78. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose - Plant theft represents a serious and growing problem for the construction sector, with the present value of UK losses estimated to be in excess of £1 million per week. Along with other stakeholders, plant managers play a key role in helping to counteract this problem, for example, by employing plant security systems (PSSs). PSSs use a variety of mechanisms to provide differing levels of protection and represent an equally diverse range of cost alternatives. In view of this diversity, this paper aims to survey a sample of plant managers to obtain their perceived importance of PSS appraisal criteria. Design/methodology/approach - A structured questionnaire elicited the perceptions of managers regarding the importance of seven generic PSS groupings by reference to six PSS assessment criteria. Data were analysed using (importance and rank) derived weighting indices to develop a PSS importance matrix. Findings - "Level of deterrent" (offered by a PSS) was consistently considered a key criterion as was "resistant attack time". Maybe surprisingly, cost was only found to be a superlative criterion for one of the six PSSs considered. The overriding indication is that plant managers afford more importance to "practical" PSS assessment criteria than they do to financial ones. Originality/value - It is proffered, that PSS manufacturers should be mindful of these observed perceptions concerning the relationship of system functionality versus cost, in striving to deliver into the plant market (and encourage use of) "optimal" security systems.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction equipment; construction industry; managers; perception; theft; United Kingdom; workplace security
Index terms: construction industry, construction equipment, construction sector, appraisal, questionnaire, methodology, survey, United Kingdom, functionality, manager, theft, manufacturer
Subjects: design features, data collection methods, criminal law, practitioner, industry analysis, research methods, factor and component analysis, construction equipment, Geography
Topics: Research Practice, Geographical Context, Plant and Equipment, Roles and Professions, Legal Issues, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here