Measuring achievement of learning organizations in construction

Chinowsky, P S; Molenaar, K and Bastias, A (2007) Measuring achievement of learning organizations in construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 14(3), pp. 215-227. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this article is to provide an introduction to the LEONARDO diagnostic tool which assists organizations in determining their current level of achievement towards a learning culture. Design/methodology/approach – Using a combination of the analytical hierarchy process and the Delphi technique, the research obtained the critical questions for evaluating an organization's investment and progress towards achieving a learning culture. The questions are categorized based on five areas of a learning culture and three levels of learning within an organization. These questions are translated into a web-based diagnostic that is validated and released for use by engineering and construction organizations. Findings – The paper provides an overview of the LEONARDO diagnostic tool including the mathematical weighting system employed for scoring organization progress and investment, the web-based availability, and the evaluation report card provided to users. The paper also provides a summary of the validation process including how organizations used the tool to determine internal learning progress. Research limitations/implications – The study obtained input primarily from large organizations and may not fully represent the entire engineering and construction industry perspective. Practical implications – The study provides a tool that assists any organization in advancing towards a learning culture that is a requirement for remaining competitive in a changing engineering marketplace. Originality/value – The paper provides an introduction to how to achieve a learning organization as an advance over collecting and managing knowledge. This is the beginning of a movement toward the next stage in achieving success within the knowledge era.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction industry; decision support systems; knowledge management; learning organizations
Index terms: methodology, Delphi technique, validation, knowledge management, movement, decision support, construction industry, analytical hierarchy process, construction organization
Subjects: data collection methods, organization, health behaviours and lifestyles, decision analysis, industry analysis, decision-making and optimization, research methods, professional development
Topics: Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here