Fernie, S and Thorpe, A (2007) Exploring change in construction: Supply chain management. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 14(4), pp. 319-333. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of the paper is to explore the process of change within organisations in the construction sector related to the content of change called for by reformers such as Egan, Latham, Constructing Excellence and the “rethinking construction” movement. The concept of supply chain management is used within the research to facilitate this kind of exploration. Design/methodology/approach – The broad framework adopted in the paper is contextual in nature and informed by structuration theory and new institutionalism. The approach followed is a case study method that looks for literal replication across a number of cases. Findings – Supply chain management is found to be both synonymous with the concept of partnering and particularly problematic for organisations to implement within the construction sector due to specific contextual factors. Research limitations/implications – All methodological positions have limitations. Like all research this piece of work is the product of choices that could have been different and achieved different outcomes. Originality/value – The findings support a view that contextual approaches provide greater insight into the problematic nature of change in the construction sector and concerns regarding the development of a robust, relevant and sustainable agenda for change within the sector.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | change management; construction industry; supply chain management; United Kingdom |
| Index terms: | construction industry, case study, Latham, partnering, construction sector, methodology, exploration, United Kingdom, change management, movement |
| Subjects: | Geography, management, research methods, industry analysis, industry policy reports, partnership management, health behaviours and lifestyles, data collection methods, environmental resource management |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Governance, Research Practice, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here