Hackett, J A and Hicks, C M (2007) Estimating as a profession in UK construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 14(1), pp. 26-51. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - Both quantity surveyors (QSs) and estimators have pivotal roles in the profitability of construction contracts; however, only the QS is classified as a professional. Preliminary examination of the responsibilities of the estimator and the level of qualification required in comparison with the QS suggests that the current failure to recognise estimating as a profession may be an anomaly. The purpose of this inquiry is to consider the role of the estimator relative to the accepted criteria attaching to professional status. Design/methodology/approach - To achieve this, available definitions of a profession were distilled into core criteria which were then used to compare QSs and estimators in terms of remuneration, education and professional representation. Findings - A statistical analysis on each of these criteria suggested that there was no significant difference in terms of salary offered or education required by employers. Further investigation, however, did reveal a considerable difference in educational and professional opportunities available to QSs. With regard to the key defining criteria of a profession and the consideration given by employers, the results indicate that there is no difference between the two groups. Originality/value - Given the information revealed by this research it may therefore be the case that the current standing of estimators should be reconsidered with the purpose of upgrading estimating to a professional status.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; estimation; quantity surveying; structural engineering; United Kingdom |
| Index terms: | estimator, methodology, estimating, surveying, upgrading, United Kingdom, investigation, construction contract, profitability, profession, construction industry, qualification, quantity surveying, estimation, statistical analysis |
| Subjects: | data science, health monitoring assessment and metrics, economic analysis, financial and cost management, profession, strategic management, data collection methods, contract type, institututions, industry analysis, educational resources, research methods, Geography |
| Topics: | Education, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Procurement, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here