Ling, F and Lim, H L (2007) Foreign firms' financial and economic risk in China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 14(4), pp. 346-362. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - The aim of this research is to investigate how foreign firms manage financial and economic risks when operating in China's construction industry. The specific purposes of the paper are to: identify the types of financial and economic risks foreign firms face and the frequency and severity of these risks; examine how foreign firms manage these risks; and recommend a risk management framework that can be adopted by foreign firms to mitigate financial and economic risks in China. Design/methodology/approach - The data collection instrument was a questionnaire which had open-ended questions. The data collection method was face-to-face in-depth interviews with 22 experts from Singapore who have experience in China's construction industry. Findings - Nine economic and financial risks affecting foreign firms that operate in China's construction industry are found. Of these, the risks that occur frequently and are severe are: labour and material price fluctuation; and contractors/ subcontractors' default. Eighteen contractual and general measures were found to be useful in mitigating these risks. Research limitations/implications - The findings may not be readily generalized because interviews were conducted with 22 China experts, all of whom are from Singapore. Practical implications - Foreign firms could use the findings to help them decide on the most appropriate measures to adopt, to overcome financial and economic risks that they face when operating in China's construction industry. Originality/value - The research proposed a framework for foreign firms to use in managing financial and economic risks in China. It recommends different measures to mitigate different types of risks.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | China; financial risk; risk management |
| Index terms: | Singapore, construction industry, risk management, face, default, interview, subcontractor, foreign firm, China, questionnaire, methodology |
| Subjects: | research methods, Geography, industry analysis, risk assessment, strategic management, data collection methods, dispute resolution, practitioner, psychology |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Organizational Design, International Construction, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here