Simulation-based scheduling of module assembly yards: Case study

Mohamed, Y; Borrego, D; Francisco, L; Al-Hussein, M; Abourizk, S and Hermann, U (2007) Simulation-based scheduling of module assembly yards: Case study. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 14(3), pp. 293-311. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose - Pipe-spool module assembly involves a variety of uncertain factors and constraints, which complicate the assembly scheduling process. These factors also pose a challenge for the scheduler who struggles to produce a schedule that optimizes both the use of available resources (e.g. space) and meets the project's delivery deadlines. In the relatively quick production cycle of module assembly, the scheduling process plays an operative role. Thus, automation of the process would enhance productivity of the schedule updating process. This paper seeks to address this issue. Design/methodology/approach - A simulation-based approach is presented for scheduling pipe-spool module assembly. This approach incorporates physical and logical constraints. General purpose simulation (GPS) is used to model these logical and heuristic constraints. Findings - The application of the proposed model to an actual case study demonstrates the significant improvement in the assembly schedule when compared to traditional CPM-based scheduling techniques. Originality/value - The proposed model allows schedulers to experiment with various rules in order to improve the scheduling process by, for example, instantly updating the schedule.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: assembly; automation; optimization techniques; production scheduling; productivity rate; simulation
Index terms: productivity, optimization technique, case study, heuristic, automation, operative, module, experiment, scheduler, scheduling, methodology
Subjects: practitioner, data collection methods, risk assessment, operations research, automation and robotics, research methods, algorithms, architectural elements, management
Topics: Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Time Control, Design Practice, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here