Applying rich picture diagrams to model case studies of construction projects

Sutrisna, M and Barrett, P (2007) Applying rich picture diagrams to model case studies of construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 14(2), pp. 164-179. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose - Information and findings from investigations of construction projects using qualitative methodologies such as the grounded theory methodology (GTM) are inevitably rich. When using multiple case studies, the cross-case analysis procedure has been found overwhelming and difficult to grasp all at once. Hence, an approach using rich picture diagrams (RPD) has been applied specifically for the purpose of modelling case studies and capturing the richness of the information along the case studies' storylines. This paper aims to explain the reasoning behind and the development process of such diagrams. Design/methodology/approach - The paper investigates the underlying concepts of the GTM, case study approach, and the soft system methodology (SSM) from which the RPD was originally derived. Based on the identified agreement between and consistency of both methodologies, the development of RPD to model case studies in an ongoing research project (using the GTM) is explained. The subsequent cross-case analysis procedure is also discussed, leading to conclusions. Findings - The paper demonstrates the applicability of the RPD originating from the SSM as a tool to present the storylines of case studies within the GTM, to improve presentation and enable thorough cross-case analysis by providing a holistic view of the storylines. Originality/value - In response to the scholarly challenge to contribute to the further development of the GTM, the paper presents the application of a tool from SSM (i.e. the RPD). Whilst enriching the techniques within the GTM, this application provides a solution for researchers and stakeholders to model case studies of construction projects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: case studies; construction works
Index terms: investigation, construction work, modelling, case study, grounded theory, methodology, construction project, cross-case analysis, reasoning
Subjects: operations management, data analysis and analytics, analytical methods, data collection methods, cognitive psychology, theoretical framing, research methods, production management
Topics: Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here