Abdel-Wahab, M S; Dainty, A R J; Ison, S G; Bowen, P and Hazlehurst, G (2008) Trends of skills and productivity in the UK construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 15(4), pp. 372-382. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - UK government policy has emphasised the role of skills development and training as a means of improving productivity performance across all sectors of the economy. The purpose of this paper is to assess the appropriateness of this policy within the context of the construction industry, in light of the recently published statistics. Design/methodology/approach - A trend analysis of construction productivity (measured by Gross Value Added/worker) and skills indicators (qualification attainment and training) was conducted over the period 1995-2006. Findings - There is inconsistency in the industry's productivity performance, despite the overall increase in qualification attainment levels and participation rates in training over the same period. However, the year-on-year change in the participation rate of training was not consistently associated with an improvement in productivity performance. Originality/value - It is argued that the effective utilisation of skills rather than mere increase in the supply of skills is a key to bringing about productivity improvements. Indeed future policy makers decisions should focus on addressing other influences on productivity performance such as work organisation and management practice to support further development and progression of the UK construction industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; government policy; productivity rate; skills; social trends; United Kingdom |
| Index terms: | construction productivity, construction industry, statistics, government policy, productivity, qualification, management practice, methodology, United Kingdom, skills development |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, management, educational resources, research methods, Geography, personnel development, public policy, operations management, mathematical modelling |
| Topics: | Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Governance, Human Resources, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here