Lost in transition: The transfer of lean manufacturing to construction

Jørgensen, B and Emmitt, S (2008) Lost in transition: The transfer of lean manufacturing to construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 15(4), pp. 383-398. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the transfer of lean manufacturing/production from the Japanese manufacturing industry to the construction sector in the west. Design/methodology/approach - Research literature from the fields of lean manufacturing/production and lean construction was reviewed. This revealed a number of characteristics that are specific to lean construction, most notably the recognition that critical research findings have been slow to emerge but appear to be gaining momentum. Findings - In the transition from manufacturing to construction the process losses appear to be related to critical aspects and the challenges surrounding practical application to a different context. Lean is highly interpretive and there is no shared definition or understanding of what is meant by lean, lean production, and lean construction. The focus has been mainly on production system design, planning and management, and implementation. This narrow focus has meant that some important issues concerning the wider aspects of lean have been overlooked. There is a need for a "back to basics" discussion on many other aspects of the approach, such as whole-life value and waste identification. Research limitations/implications - The work is limited to an extensive literature review. Originality/value - The extensive literature review makes an original contribution to the lean construction field and provides a valuable resource for researchers.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction industry; lean production; manufacturing systems; transfer processes
Index terms: implementation, construction industry, construction sector, lean manufacturing, methodology, lean production, manufacturing industry, literature review, production system, lean construction
Subjects: building construction, industry analysis, manufacturing engineering, research methods, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements
Topics: Site Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here