Implementation of innovation by manufacturers subcontracting to construction projects

Manley, K (2008) Implementation of innovation by manufacturers subcontracting to construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 15(3), pp. 230-245. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the role played by manufacturers of patented products on construction projects. Design/methodology/approach - Four projects are reviewed to investigate the research question "How can manufacturers ensure the successful implementation of their product innovations on construction projects?" Findings - Using a framework comprising six key innovation determinants, case-study analysis demonstrates the critical role played by relationships and knowledge-flows in creating conditions that support project-based innovation by manufacturers. Such conditions comprise: advanced procurement systems, robust internal firm competencies, performance-based regulations, effective technical support providers, and project-imbedded manufacturers. Research limitations/implications - The study was designed to meet industry needs and hence does not emphasise theoretical aspects. Practical implications - Manufacturers can improve the diffusion of their product innovations on construction projects by using relationship networks to promote the above conditions, or to locate contexts where such conditions prevail, or to leverage those conditions that are most favourable. Originality/value - The paper addresses four gaps in the construction management literature: there is very little literature on the role of manufacturers in innovation on construction projects; the literature on subcontractors tends to assume easily substitutable supplies; there is a focus in the literature on large projects, and the literature is dominated by quantitative studies. By undertaking a qualitative analysis of manufacturers of patented products subcontracting to small projects, this paper addresses the above shortcomings.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Australia; construction industry; innovation; patents
Index terms: subcontractor, methodology, construction project, qualitative analysis, manufacturer, performance-based regulation, construction industry, determinant, implementation, small project, procurement system, subcontracting, Australia, product innovation
Subjects: industry analysis, regulatory law, Geography, production management, research methods, contractual arrangements, practitioner, innovation studies, research design and methodology, organization, risk assessment
Topics: Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Procurement, Business Strategy, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Legal Issues, Supply Chain Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here