Analysis of the quality attributes used in establishing best value tenders in the UK social housing sector

Phillips, S; Martin, J; Dainty, A and Price, A (2008) Analysis of the quality attributes used in establishing best value tenders in the UK social housing sector. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 15(4), pp. 307-320. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose – A number of studies have highlighted the problems and challenges that have been encountered with the analysis of best value and partnering tenders carried out in the UK public sector. One of the principal issues is that client organisations and decision makers have to assess numerous diverse quality attributes as part of the contractor selection process. The purpose of this paper is to present the findings of research, which aimed to identify the core factors, which could be used to differentiate bids in the context of social housing. Design/methodology/approach – A questionnaire was sent to a cross-section of stakeholders within the social housing sector asking the respondents to rank the importance of 35 attributes with respect to selecting a successful contractor. The responses were subjected to principal component analysis to detect a structure in the relationship between the attributes and classify the attributes into a set of factors. Findings – The results indicate that the 35 attributes could be grouped together and reduced to ten core factors. Practical implications – Application of the results could enable the stakeholders to streamline the tender analysis procedure allowing the high volume of tenders to be dealt with more effectively and efficiently. Originality/value – It is not expected that client organisations would limit their tender analysis to the ten core factors only. They are not intended to be prescriptive and the paper only provides a starting point in using them in the choice of contractor selection quality attributes.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: fair value; housing; quality indicators; United Kingdom
Index terms: methodology, questionnaire, best value tender, housing, United Kingdom, client organization, quality indicator, best value, principal component analysis, social housing, partnering, contractor selection, fair value, public sector
Subjects: partnership management, housing and residential development, statistical analysis, administrative law, tendering, research methods, Geography, economic analysis, project delivery, bidding, client relations, construction type, data collection methods
Topics: Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Procurement, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Quality Management, Legal Issues, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here