Building capability in construction projects: A relationship-based approach

Davis, P R and Walker, D H T (2009) Building capability in construction projects: A relationship-based approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 16(5), pp. 475-489. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this paper is to propose a way that the development of human social relationship capital can be identified and measured in a construction project environment. Design/methodology/approach Theory on the creation of social capital and consequent intellectual capital between parties to collaborative project procurement is explored. This is an exploratory study using grounded theory. Findings A proposed capability maturity model (CMM) is posited that can be used to measure improvement in developing human social capital, and assisting in project strategy formulation. Two recent Australian alliance projects are analysed using the model to gain insights into how the quality of relationships within project alliances can be assessed. Practical implications The model described in this paper may be used to measure performance or as an initial step towards strategising a change management plan based upon identifying a "current" situation. Originality/value Each alliance is unique and so its goals with regard to social capital will vary. Accordingly the results should be viewed accordingly. Work in this area using a CMM approach is relatively rare, and so this paper provides a novel way of measuring a complex concept such as social capital.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Australia; construction industry; human capital; procurement strategic alliances
Index terms: construction industry, collaborative project, Australia, grounded theory, strategic alliance, human capital, capability maturity model, construction project, methodology, project strategy, social capital, exploratory study, project alliance, change management
Subjects: contractual arrangements, strategic project management, Geography, production management, management, theoretical framing, economics, research methods, industry analysis, partnership management, sociology
Topics: Organizational Design, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Business Strategy, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here