Enshassi, A; Mohamed, S and El-Ghandour, S (2009) Problems associated with the process of claim management in Palestine: Contractors' perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 16(1), pp. 61-72. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - During the past few years, only a limited number of construction projects in Palestine were completed on time; indeed many of these projects had been delayed for reasons believed to be outside the control of both the contractors and owners. Such delays have given rise to many claims and conflicts. The aim of this paper is to investigate this widespread phenomenon, and its associated problems, from the perspective of the local contractors. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reports on a questionnaire-based research investigation targeting local contractors with a focus on critical problems associated with the process of claim management, starting with claim identification, through to claim notification, examination, documentation, presentation, and negotiation. Findings - The paper presents the survey results and main findings which indicate that: lack of site staff awareness to proactively detect claims, inaccessibility or unavailability of relevant documents, and conflicts arising during owner/contractor negotiation are all critical problems associated with the process of claim management. Originality/value - The outcome of this research will assist local contractors in understanding the critical problems associated with the process of claim management; thus minimizing the number of, and cost associated with, claims and conflicts.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | conflict management; construction industry; palestine |
| Index terms: | Palestine, owner, claim management, investigation, construction industry, negotiation, site staff, conflict management, documentation, survey, construction project, methodology, questionnaire, documents, local contractor |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, practitioner, research methods, professional development, contractual condition, Geography, production management, sociology, conflict resolution, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Information Management, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here