Framework for managing multicultural project teams

Godfrey Ochieng, E and Price, A D (2009) Framework for managing multicultural project teams. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 16(6), pp. 527-543. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present literature that suggests that project teams comprising members from culturally diverse backgrounds bring fresh ideas and new approaches to problem solving. The challenge, however, is that they also introduce different understandings and expectations regarding team dynamics and integration. The question becomes how a project manager can effectively work and influence a multicultural construction project team, at the same time being attentive to the diversity and creating the structure required for success. Design/methodology/approach – Using a qualitative methodology, participants of heavy construction engineering projects revealed a number of multi-dimensional factors that either facilitated or limited the effectiveness of multicultural teamwork. These were synthesised into a framework of eight key dimensions that need to be considered when managing multicultural teams. The identified key dimensions include: leadership style, team selection and composition process, cross-cultural management of team development process, cross-cultural communication, cross-cultural collectivism, cross-cultural trust, cross-cultural management and cross-cultural uncertainty. Findings – The proposed framework has implications for construction managers who work with multicultural teams and are committed to improving team performance and productivity. The utilisation of the proposed framework would not instantly transform multicultural teams into high-performing ones; however, it does identify eight key cross-cultural dimensions, which need to be considered. Originality/value – Though the benefits of culturally diverse teams have been acknowledged within the industry, the study highlighted that cultural differences among project teams can cause conflict, misunderstanding and poor project performance.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction industry; integration; Kenya; multicultural management; United Kingdom
Index terms: cultural difference, United Kingdom, leadership style, team development process, Kenya, integration, methodology, problem solving, construction manager, productivity, construction project team, teamwork, project manager, dimension, heavy construction, construction industry, project team, team performance, team dynamics, project performance, effectiveness
Subjects: health monitoring assessment and metrics, project delivery, profession, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, leadership, cross-cultural studies, organizational analysis, project management theory and practice, Geography, performance management, decision-making and reasoning, research methods, management
Topics: Organizational Design, International Construction, Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here