A decision-making system for accelerating roadway construction

Goodrum, P M; Wan, Y and Fenouil, P C (2009) A decision-making system for accelerating roadway construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 16(2), pp. 116-135. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to show the way in which State Transportation Agencies throughout the USA are under increasing pressure to preserve and expand the nation's roadway infrastructure in the shortest possible time with only a finite pool of resources with which to meet a state's transportation needs. With this in mind, a rapid construction methods decision-making system was developed, to be used during the preliminary and conceptual design stage of a roadway project. Design/methodology/approach – The research completed an extensive literature review and examined case studies to identify rapid construction methods and summarize valuable lessons learned. Designed for use by the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, the research developed a series of conceptual road user cost (RUC) tables that reflect different socioeconomic conditions by varying the value of time based on average hourly per capita income and wages for different counties in Kentucky. Findings – The case studies identified that the most effective mean for State Transportation Agencies to accelerate construction is through their construction contracts. Furthermore, determining RUC as outlined in the research way simplifies the method of calculating RUC by using fewer variables than would typically be available during the preliminary and conceptual design stage. Research limitations/implications – The proposed decision-making model is designed for State Transportation Agencies who are involved in the scenarios of determining the value of accelerating construction in both an urban and rural environments. Practical implications – The project's intent in determining conceptual road user costs is to support a decision-making process to identify the need and type of rapid construction methods for any given project. Originality/value – A specific decision-making process is proposed, and it uses the ratios of the Conceptual Road User Cost to the Maximum Allowable Road User Cost and a set of additional criteria based on project features to recommend a selection of rapid construction methods for a given highway project.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction works; motor roads; time measurement; transportation; United States of America
Index terms: construction method, literature review, wages, lessons learned, conceptual design, methodology, decision-making, decision-making process, transportation agency, case study, United States of America, construction work, construction contract, highway construction, income
Subjects: transportation engineering, building construction, decision analysis, business economics, professional development, Geography, research methods, civil engineering, design practice, economic analysis, data analysis and analytics, operations management, contract type, data collection methods
Topics: Site Management, Human Resources, Design Practice, Procurement, Risk Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here