Keeble Kululanga, G (2009) Construction process improvement through cognitive power under team generative learning. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 16(4), pp. 307-324. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to report a study that explores the means through which cognitive power under team learning is exploited for generative learning in order to remain competitive in the challenging business environment and to examine the extent to which various types of teams are used for purposes of generative learning by construction contractors. Design/methodology/approach – To ascertain the significance of cognitive power through various types of teams, a study was undertaken in Malawi, one of the countries in the Sub-Saharan region. A questionnaire survey was employed to elicit data on the constructs of cognitive power from various types of business teams that were employed by construction contractors. Findings – Using cognitive power under team application as an analytical lens, the research shows that construction contractors displayed low cognitive, social and physical competences in the various types of teams as critical determinants for generative learning. Innovative behaviour of construction contractors correlated positively to the overall physical, social and cognitive competences. Research limitations/implications – A comparative study of the three preconditions for team generative learning in other developing and developed construction business environments is recommended whose results could further enrich the industry with tools for enhancing innovative behaviour of construction contractors. Practical implications – The primary implication of the research findings is that construction executives have an additional role of harnessing and managing cognitive power where mission-pertinent learning and knowledge activities should be nurtured. In practice, it means that the objectives of utilizing various business teams need to be re-conceptualized. Originality/value – The article should be valuable to the leader of any construction organisation that is attempting to sustain superior competitive performance in the knowledge economy through effective engagement and utilization of business teams.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cognition; competences; construction industry; Malawi; team learning |
| Index terms: | survey, methodology, construction process, competence, cognition, questionnaire, construction contractor, construction organization, comparative study, executive, construction industry, determinant, Malawi |
| Subjects: | practitioner, organization, research design and methodology, data collection methods, risk assessment, industry analysis, building construction, cognitive psychology, personnel development, Geography, research methods |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Site Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Risk Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here