Minh Van, N and Ha, K D (2024) A corporate social responsibility implementation index for architectural design firms in Vietnam. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(1), pp. 65-78. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become a popular concept in the construction industry because of the growing concerns over sustainable development. While architectural design firms (ADFs) hold an essential role in construction projects, there is a lack of studies examining CSR implementation (CSRI) in these organizations. This research aims to identify common CSR activities and to develop a CSRI index that enables practitioners to understand the importance of each CSR group. Through literature review and semi-structured interviews, critical CSR activities were first identified. Through factor analysis, 24 CSR activities were then organized into six groups. The fuzzy synthetic evaluation (FSE) technique was employed to value the importance of each group, which then be normalized to determine the CSRI index. The findings highlight that CSRI in Vietnamese ADFs is at a pretty high level. The clients' interest CSR group ranks as the most critical position, followed by employees' interest, community engagement, ethics, shareholders' and partners' interest, and environment preservation, respectively. This research is one of the first studies that examine and evaluate CSRI in ADFs. The CSRI index is a robust formulation that provides Vietnamese ADFs with a practical tool to allocate scarce organizational resources to gain competitive business advantages properly.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architecture; architectural design firms; corporation social responsibility; fuzzy synthetic evaluation; social responsibility; architectural design; factor analysis; community involvement; business competition; community participation; sustainable development; ethical standards; project engineering |
| Index terms: | fuzzy synthetic evaluation, interview, Vietnam, business competition, community participation, ethics, literature review, community engagement, sustainable development, factor analysis, practitioner, construction project, project engineering, competitive busines, architectural design, community involvement, corporate social responsibility, implementation, social responsibility, construction industry |
| Subjects: | design practice, economics, production management, Geography, health safety and environment, decision-making and optimization, industry analysis, statistical analysis, data collection methods, community and social dimensions, control systems, practitioner, ethical practice, business management, participation process, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here