Ling, F and Lim, S H (2010) Improving export performance of contractors from China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 17(6), pp. 581-597. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - Construction firms in the People's Republic of China (PRC) have been exporting their services to foreign countries. The aim of this research is to study how PRC contractors can improve their export performance. The specific objectives are to: ascertain the performance outcomes of projects undertaken by PRC contractors; identify strategies that PRC firms adopt to enable them to export effectively; and recommend areas in which PRC firms can improve their export performance. Design/methodology/approach - The research design is a multi-pronged approach, comprising industry-wide postal/e-mail survey using a structured questionnaire, in-depth face-to-face interviews with PRC firms operating in Singapore and Singaporean firms that had worked with PRC firms in Singapore. Open-ended questions were administered for the interviews. Findings - The results show that PRC firms adopt cost leadership, diversification and networking strategies effectively. They generally have strong financial capacity and receive strong government support in their export activity. They offer low bids through low profit margins, low labour cost and satisfactory quality. They are not operating at the optimum level and there is room for improvement, if they wish to improve their export performance. Research limitations/implications - The limitation of the present findings is that PRC firms' export activities are investigated from the Singapore context, which may not be generalizable. Only nine PRC firms were interviewed, but this nevertheless represents 69 per cent of registered PRC contractors in Singapore. The qualitative data from the interviews precluded statistical analysis, but provided rich and comparable insights. Practical implications - The study presents recommendations on how PRC firms may improve their export performance. Non-PRC firms would be informed of the strategies and actions that PRC firms take or will take, and will be better prepared to compete with them internationally. Originality/value - The study is of value because it identifies the strengths of PRC firms as exporters of construction services. Recommendations on how PRC firms can improve their export performance are also offered. PRC firms may leverage on their strengths, and take in some of the recommendations, so that they can further improve their export performance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | China; competitive advantage; globalization; Singapore |
| Index terms: | face, networking, research design, globalization, e-mail, survey, construction firm, interview, methodology, Singapore, performance outcome, profit, competitive advantage, questionnaire, export, diversification, government support, strategy, China, statistical analysis, labour cost |
| Subjects: | economic factors, psychology, management, research design and methodology, communication, organization, data collection methods, market analysis, government bodies, value management, data science, economic analysis, Geography, research methods, cost management |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Information Management, Governance, International Construction, Procurement, Research Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here