The education of innovative engineers

MacLeod, I A (2010) The education of innovative engineers. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 17(1), pp. 21-34. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose - Traditional engineering education in the UK, as established in the nineteenth century, is based on the principle that a degree in engineering should be focused on engineering science and not on the practice of engineering. This has proved to be seriously negative to the development of engineering ability in general and innovative engineering in particular. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the reasons for this situation. Design/methodology/approach - Features of innovative engineering are outlined and a structure for learning which has potential to promote innovation is proposed. Findings - Because of principles based on misplaced academic elitism established in the nineteenth century, traditional engineering curricula tend to develop an academic mindset rather than an engineering mindset in students. They do little to support innovative engineering. As a result, the large amount of money spent on engineering education in the UK does not represent a good investment. The academic mindset does not well support any professional context. Originality/value - The paper provides a challenge to universities and professional engineering institutions which should be addressed.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction engineering; education; innovation; tacit knowledge; United Kingdom paper type research paper
Index terms: United Kingdom, research paper, engineer, construction engineering, tacit knowledge, mindset, science, methodology, engineering education
Subjects: Geography, research methods, engineering methods, specialized education, research dissemination and communication, professional education, profession, health behaviours and lifestyles, professional development
Topics: Education, Geographical Context, Information Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here