Ng, S T; Xie, J and Kumaraswamy, M M (2010) Simulating the effect of risks on equity return for concession-based public-private partnership projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 17(4), pp. 352-368. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - Unlike other project delivery options, a much larger proportion of risks is borne by the private partner in public-private partnerships, since a large amount of equity is needed to finance the scheme. As a result, it is of paramount importance for the franchisee to analyse the possible project outcomes with due reference to potential risks affecting cash inflow and outflow. The purpose of this paper is to address the shortcomings of deterministic estimations by developing a proposal for a simulation model that aims to unveil the probability distributions of the equity amount and return on equity. Design/methodology/approach - In this paper, a simulation model is developed to establish the probability distributions of these two indicators under the influence of risks. A simple case study is also presented to illustrate the concept and application of this model. Findings - The simulation model can generate the probability distributions related to the net present value of the equity component as well as the rate of return on equity. Practical implications - The method proposed in this paper should help the private investors analyse the amount of equity to be injected to the project and its corresponding return rate. Originality/value - By referring to the probability distribution, an equity investor can establish whether they can recover their investment and gain a desired return rate. Based upon the risk attitude of the investor, decision-makers can then decide whether the scheme should be pursued or not.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | debts; equity capital; finance; partnership; rate of return; simulation |
| Index terms: | methodology, proposal, risk attitude, option, project delivery, estimation, net present value, project outcome, probability distribution, partnership, case study, investor |
| Subjects: | project completion, data collection methods, project delivery, financial and cost management, economic analysis, project planning, research methods, decision-making and reasoning, statistical analysis, decision analysis, sociology, partnership management |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Procurement, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here