Comparative analysis of operational coefficients' impact on excavation operations

Panas, A and Pantouvakis, J P (2010) Comparative analysis of operational coefficients' impact on excavation operations. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 17(5), pp. 461-475. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose-The paper aims to provide a structured framework for comparing different productivity estimation methodologies and evaluate their sensitivity to operational coefficients variation for excavation operations. Design/methodology/approach-Two process-oriented methodologies were analysed in a deterministic fashion in terms of their input requirements and their respective outputs. A phase-oriented framework was presented to enable their comparison. The research methodology allows the estimation of excavation productivity in relation to the selected operational coefficients. Findings-The system productivity is significantly influenced by operational conditions, such as the digging depth and the swing angle from the excavation front to the dumping position. Each methodology presents a differing sensitivity to every operational factor. Since the excavator is considered as the system's leading resource, the variation on productivity has direct implications for the truck fleet size and the unit cost of operations. Originality/value-The proposed approach is useful in analyzing process-oriented productivity estimation methodologies under a given set of operational coefficients when no historical data is available. Thus, it provides an alternative to intuitive estimates based solely on personal judgment. The concept of "baseline reference" conditions is introduced, so as to enable the transformation of any operational scenario into equivalent mathematical models that allow comparisons between different estimation methodologies and computational approaches. All rights reserved.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction operations; productivity rate
Index terms: variation, methodology, excavation, unit cost, mathematical model, comparative analysis, research methodology, estimate, judgment, productivity, construction operation, transformation, estimation
Subjects: business, mathematical modelling, research design and methodology, dispute resolution, data analysis and analytics, construction operations, financial and cost management, management, research methods, contractual condition
Topics: Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Site Management, Contract Administration, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here