Anvuur, A M; Kumaraswamy, M M and Mahesh, G (2011) Building relationally integrated value networks (RIVANS). Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 18(1), pp. 102-120. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - Advocacy for the re-integration of highly differentiated, at times fragmented, construction project "teams" and supply chains has increased in this era of network competition, yet industry targets remain elusive. This paper aims to report on findings of research focused on the development and validation of the building-blocks for relationally integrated value networks (RIVANS) that seeks to redress this issue. Design/methodology/ approach - Complementary theoretical streams are identified through an extensive literature review, and are used to shape and inform discussions of the key RIVANS themes of value objectives, network management, learning, and maturity. Four moderated focus groups hosted in each of two workshops in Hong Kong, are used to validate these themes. Each workshop typically comprised thematic focus group sessions in between introductory presentations and a plenary consolidation session. Findings - The findings indicate strong support for the comprehensive coverage, appropriateness and practical relevance of the key RIVANS themes. The findings also suggest that public sector clients and procuring agents need empowerment to provide adequate leadership and create the environmental contexts required in RIVANS. Research limitations/implications - The chosen research approach and context may temper the generalisability of the findings reported in this paper. Therefore, researchers are encouraged to test the proposed RIVANS concepts in other contexts. Practical implications - Implications for the development of basic implementation templates for RIVANS are discussed. Originality/value - This paper responds to a clearly identified need for integrative value-based models of competitiveness in construction. 0969-9988.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; intelligent networks; organizations; performance management; value added |
| Index terms: | integration, methodology, stream, construction project, competition, validation, agent, empowerment, focus group, public-sector client, literature review, value network, competitiveness, implementation, construction industry, performance management, Hong Kong, workshop |
| Subjects: | value management, practitioner, construction type, data collection methods, contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, Geography, water management, production management, professional development, performance measurement, management, research methods, industry analysis, market analysis, organizational analysis, sociology |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Quality Management, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Information Management, Construction Technology, Procurement, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here