An evaluation of construction skills in Tanzania

Kikwasi, G J (2011) An evaluation of construction skills in Tanzania. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 18(2), pp. 127-139. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present the findings of a study related to availability of construction skills in Tanzania. Design/methodology/approach – A questionnaire survey and interview were designed to assess the availability of construction skills at management/supervisory and operative levels in Tanzania. At both levels skills were carefully selected for the respondents to rank and open-ended questions were designed to investigate how employers obtain employees and test their competences. Findings – Findings from the study indicate that at both management/supervisory and operative levels some skills are available on special arrangements. Furthermore, 60 per cent of employers neither enquire about the training background nor test the competence of skilled workers before engaging them. Research limitations/implications – This study was mainly affected by low response to e-mailed questionnaires. Practical implications – The findings of this study provide an insight on the skills status in Tanzania and the study also proposes a skills screening process for employers. Originality/value – This paper proposes a screening and grouping of operatives process for use by employers in testing and improving competences of prospective employees and to establish their training background.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction industry; quality; skills; Tanzania; training
Index terms: operative, construction industry, testing, screening, skilled worker, Tanzania, questionnaire, methodology, competence, survey, interview
Subjects: professional practice, data collection methods, practitioner, industry analysis, management, research methods, Geography, personnel development
Topics: Human Resources, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here