A conceptual framework of the interface between the design and construction processes

Mitchell, A; Frame, I; Coday, A and Hoxley, M (2011) A conceptual framework of the interface between the design and construction processes. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 18(3), pp. 297-311. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose - As the construction industry strives for closer integration of the participants, more responsibility for the management of the detailed design process is being directed to main contractors and combined with their existing duties of managing the construction and pre-construction processes. Crucially, this necessitates successful management of the interface between these processes, and this paper seeks to investigate a conceptual view of that interface to provide a foundation for improving understanding of it. Design/methodology/approach - Recent and current literature is examined, and various theoretical backgrounds for the design and the construction processes are reviewed. The consequences for the understanding of the interface are discussed. The significance of conceptual frameworks is also reviewed. Findings - A significant difference is identified in the published work between the theoretical understandings of the construction and design processes. From this a conceptual framework for the interface between these processes is developed. Practical implications - The difference identified may have significant implications for further research, and for the development of management techniques applicable to the interface. Furthermore, the lack of access to specialist knowledge at the optimum time during the design process is identified as having a potentially significant impact on that process. Originality/value - These findings could provide an understanding and basis for further research into the interface between the processes, and for the development of an enhanced model that would facilitate improved management of the interface and the optimisation of the process of the selection, appointment and input of specialist subcontractors.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction industry; design and development; management development; procurement
Index terms: construction industry, design and construction, pre-construction, design and development, main contractor, subcontractor, duty, conceptual framework, integration, construction process, methodology, design process
Subjects: contractual arrangements, project delivery, contractual role, design methods, practitioner, organizational analysis, building construction, industry analysis, theoretical framing, research methods, design process
Topics: Procurement, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management, Contract Administration, Organizational Design, Site Management, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here