Mohamed, S and Chinda, T (2011) System dynamics modelling of construction safety culture. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 18(3), pp. 266-281. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - This paper forms part of an ongoing research project being undertaken by the authors into construction safety culture. The paper aims to investigate the interactions among five key enablers of construction safety culture, as well as the potential impact of each enabler on organisational safety goals over a period of time. Design/methodology/approach - Using system dynamics modelling, the paper reports on the development of a causal model simulating the interactions among safety culture enablers. The model is developed based on the logical assumption that, by improving the enablers, there will be an inevitable safety performance improvement. An index is also proposed and used as an indicator for assessing the maturity level of safety culture. Findings - The paper presents and reports on simulation results which reveal that an organisation with ad-hoc safety implementation (starting at a basic level of safety culture maturity) should primarily focus on enhancing leadership attributes, in the context of safety, to rapidly and successfully progress through to higher maturity levels in the future. Practical implications - The use of system dynamic modelling, with the developed index, will help organisations to plan the most effective safety implementation process to achieve their safety goals within a planned time frame. Originality/value - The use of modelling, with the developed index, will help organisations to plan the most effective safety implementation process to achieve their safety goals within a planned time frame.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; culture; leadership; safety |
| Index terms: | methodology, system dynamics, safety performance, dynamic modelling, construction safety, maturity level, safety culture, construction industry, interaction, implementation, modelling |
| Subjects: | computing systems, modelling and simulation, analytical methods, contractual arrangements, research methods, evaluation, health safety and environment, occupational health and safety management, environmental health, behavioral psychology, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Procurement, Sustainability, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here