Tan, Y; Shen, L Y and Langston, C (2011) A fuzzy approach for assessing contractors' competitiveness. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 18(3), pp. 234-247. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose – Proper assessment of contractors' competitiveness is important for assisting contractors in taking internal analysis and for assisting clients in selecting suitable contractors. This paper seeks to address this issue. Design/methodology/approach – With previously identified contractor key competitiveness indicators (KCIs), this study presents a fuzzy competitiveness rating (FCR) method for measuring contractor competitiveness with reference to the Hong Kong construction industry. A set of linguistic terms is used for facilitating the assessment process. Findings – For illustration, an example is used to show the application of the FCR method. The results provide valuable information for helping contractors in the local construction industry to understand their competitive advantages and weaknesses, and to formulate effective competition strategies to improve their competitiveness. Research limitations/implications – The model used in this study is not validated by real cases. In a future paper, the model will be further demonstrated by conducting real case studies, and the linguistic terms and corresponding fuzzy numbers will also be re-defined based on the collected data. Originality/value – As the competitiveness assessment process involves complexity and uncertainty, a fuzzy competitiveness rating method is considered suitable for reflecting the reality and the assessment panel can easily give their opinions by using the linguistic language.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | competitive strategy; construction industry; fuzzy control; Hong Kong; linguistics |
| Index terms: | construction industry, competitiveness, case study, competitive advantage, Hong Kong, complexity, competitive strategy, competition, methodology, strategy |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, data collection methods, industry analysis, systems engineering, market analysis, Geography, management, research methods |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here