Brewer, G and Strahorn, S (2012) Trust and the Project Management Body of knowledge. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 19(3), pp. 286-305. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - This paper aims to identify the extent to which dimensions of trust are reflected in the functional description of the role of a project manager as outlined in the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK). Design/methodology/approach - The literature is used to identify trust dimensions that have the potential to impact on the conduct of a project. These are then assembled into a theoretical framework, which is then used to drive a thematic analysis of the project manager's role as described in PMBOK. Similarities are confirmed, and absences identified and explained in the context of the literature. Findings - The fourth edition of PMBOK is the first to make overt reference to the concept of trust. Detailed analysis of the text reveals that although certain trust dimensions are recognised they are dealt with in general terms, as desirable characteristics within the project environment rather than specific facilitators or actions in relation to the conduct of project. Practical implications - PMBOK is the most widely recognised standard for the conduct of project management, and as such has achieved wide acceptance as defining the project manager's role. It recognises trust as playing a part in the successful management of projects. However, fostering trust is central to the art of project management, and requires greater consideration than indicated by PMBOK. Originality/value - This is the first critical analysis of PMBOK in relation to trust.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | project management; project management body of knowledge; trust |
| Index terms: | methodology, thematic analysis, body of knowledge, dimension, project management, project manager, facilitator |
| Subjects: | research methods, project management theory and practice, methods and analysis, profession, practitioner, health monitoring assessment and metrics, knowledge management |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Health and Safety, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here