Farran, M and Zayed, T (2012) New life-cycle costing approach for infrastructure rehabilitation. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 19(1), pp. 40-60. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - Several rehabilitation planning methods are reported in the literature for public infrastructures, such as bridges, pavements, sewers, etc. These methods, however, are limited to specific types of infrastructures. The purpose of the present research is to develop a novel and generic method for Maintenance and Rehabilitation Planning for Public Infrastructure (Mamp;RPPI), which aims at determining the optimal rehabilitation profile over a desired analysis period. Design/methodology/approach - The Mamp;RPPI method is based on life-cycle costing (LCC) with probabilistic and continuous rating approach for condition states. The Mamp;RPPI uses a new approach of "dynamic" Markov chain to represent the deterioration mechanism of an infrastructure and the impact of rehabilitation interventions on such infrastructure. It also uses genetic algorithm (GA) in conjunction with Markov chains in order to find the optimal rehabilitation profile. A case study is presented with a comparison between the traditional Markov decision process (MDP) and the newly developed method. Findings - The new method, which generates lower LCC, is found practical in providing a complete Mamp;R plan over a required study period, compared to a stationary decision policy with the traditional MDP. In addition, GA is found useful in the optimization process and overcomes the computational difficulties for large combinatorial problems. Research limitations/implications - The implementation of the developed models is limited to only four alternatives/actions. However, the developed models and framework are superior for MDP. Practical implications - The developed methodology and model play essential roles in the decision-making process. Originality/value - The new method is beneficial to researchers and practitioners. It is developed for a single facility; however, it provides a major step towards a broader infrastructure management system and capital budgeting problems.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | dynamic markov chain; genetic algorithms; infrastructure systems; life cycle costs; markov decision process |
| Index terms: | life cycle cost, genetic algorithm, sewer, deterioration, practitioner, methodology, decision process, capital budgeting, decision-making process, Markov chain, infrastructure management, public infrastructure, planning method, case study, costing, implementation |
| Subjects: | urban planning, material degradation and durability, contractual arrangements, mathematical modelling, data collection methods, practitioner, decision analysis, budgeting, infrastructure and transport systems, algorithms, research methods, accounting and finance, infrastructure engineering |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Governance, Cost Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here