Gluch, P and Räisänen, C (2012) What tensions obstruct an alignment between project and environmental management practices? Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 19(2), pp. 127-140. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Using an activity theory lens, this paper aims to examine the interrelationships between project practice and environmental management. It also aims to focus on tensions that occur between human agents and material objects within a motivedirected, historicallysituated activity system, namely that of managing environmental issues in projects. Case studies of two large infrastructure projects were conducted 20032004 and 2008. The studies comprised onsite observations, text analyses, 20 semistructured interviews and one group interview. Time was spent on the construction site to become familiarized with the context and the practices of the project community. A total of 15 weekly environmental site inspections were monitored and photodocumented. The findings show how new and emergent environmental management practices and routines were inherently contradictory to the situated and established culture within the projects. In fact project practices seemed to amplify the contradictions between environmental management and project management rather than mitigating them. As a result project members and organization members strove toward different goals and foci. It is argued that management needs to create arenas where members from the two units can align practices and merge routines. Aligning the permanent structures of the organization with the temporary organizing of practices and operational activities in projects is a challenge for the construction industry. A prevalent lack of fit between the organization and its projects causes contradictions which negatively affect the way in which longterm environmental strategies and goals are understood and implemented in the project settings. The system theoretical lens adopted in this study enables a holistic interpretation of complex and dynamic activities and the linking of the micro, the individual, to the macro, the organizational structure. By indicating some inherent and emergent contradictions between project practice and corporate environmental management, this paper contributes to an emergent field of research that focuses on social practice in construction.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | activity theory; environmental management; project management; projectbased organizing; social practices; sociocultural theory |
| Index terms: | agent, social practice, construction site, strategy, text analysis, interview, environmental issue, routine, organizational structure, large infrastructure project, construction industry, environmental management, project management, activity theory, motive, inspection, case study |
| Subjects: | psychology, work location, analytical methods, data collection methods, environmental issues, practitioner, sociology, industry analysis, quality assurance, sustainability assessment, management, theoretical framing, social theory, infrastructure engineering, project management theory and practice |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Human Resources, Organizational Design, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here