Heravi, G and Ilbeigi, M (2012) Development of a comprehensive model for construction project success evaluation by contractors. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 19(5), pp. 526-542. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to develop a quantitative comprehensive model for construction project success evaluation, from the viewpoint of a contractor company. Design/methodology/approach - In this paper, the authors used a comprehensive definition of project success consisting of two components: Product success, which deals with the effect of the project's final product; and Project Management success, which focuses upon the project process. The research methodology includes five steps: identification of the critical performance indices for the two above mentioned components; quantification of the performance indices; normalization of the indices; integration of the various performance indices to develop an overall project performance function; and applying the model on a real project in Iran and analyzing the results. Findings - This paper introduces a novel model to evaluate and measure the construction project success from the viewpoint of a contractor company. The results show that this model can be used as a reliable tool to measure the project performance of contractors and their points of strength and weakness can be determined precisely. Practical implications - Analyzing the results of the case study shows that the evaluation model is absolutely applicable. All necessary elements to quantify the critical performance indices and overall project success can be recorded precisely and easily. Thus, this model can be used in every contractor company concerned about its projects' performance. Originality/value - The evaluation model proposed in this paper is a unique and comprehensive quantified model which considers difference between project success and project management success and all critical indices which can affect them.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; contractor company; critical performance indices; critical success factors; Iran; product success; project evaluation; project management; project management success |
| Index terms: | case study, project success, quantification, project evaluation, project management, construction industry, research methodology, project performance, critical success factor, methodology, integration, construction project |
| Subjects: | research methods, project management theory and practice, production management, measurement and scaling, organizational analysis, industry analysis, research design and methodology, data collection methods, control systems, value management |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Project Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here