Li, S and Ling, F Y Y (2012) Critical strategies for Chinese architectural, engineering and construction firms to achieve profitability. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 19(5), pp. 495-511. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - An appropriate choice of strategies helps firms to survive and develop in a turbulent economic environment. The problem is that there are many strategies that can be adopted, but it is not clear which ones would boost profitability. The purpose of this paper is to investigate how architectural, engineering and construction (A/E/C) firms headquartered in mainland China (Chinese A/E/C firms) can achieve profitability in China; specifically, to uncover the critical strategies and practices adopted by Chinese A/E/C firms to achieve profitability using Porter's generic competitive strategies, Sun Tzu's Art of War, and the networking approach. Design/methodology/approach - The data collection instrument was a structured questionnaire. The data collection methods were mail survey and face-to-face interviews. The population comprised all A/E/C firms headquartered in China. Samples were randomly drawn from the China Construction Industry Association's database. Stratified sampling was adopted to select only firms that operated in Shanghai or Beijing. Findings - The finding is that profitable Chinese A/E/C firms are more likely to adopt practices that differentiate them from competitors instead of pursuing a low-cost strategy or focus strategy. In addition, they adopt practices that make them adaptable and flexible. Also, practices that involve collaboration, knowledge sharing, and obtaining resources from firms in the network are adopted by profitable firms. Research limitations/implications - The data gathered might not be easily generalized to Chinese A/E/C firms operating in other parts of China because interviews were conducted with Chinese A/E/C firms operating in Beijing and Shanghai which are members of China's Construction Industry Association. Practical implications - The paper is to inform practitioners of the practices and strategies that lead to profitability. Foreign firms that are planning to partner with Chinese A/E/C firms may also use the findings to assess whether their prospective Chinese partners are adopting some of these practices, so that they would be profitable and not face financial difficulties in the course of the partnership. Originality/value - The paper shows that profitability could be achieved by certain critical practices, which are underpinned by Porter's generic competitive strategies, Sun Tzu's Art of War based on military tactics, and Granovetter's network approach based on social network theory.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptability; China; competitive strategy; competitiveness; construction industry; critical success factors; profit; profitability; social network |
| Index terms: | Beijing, sampling, competitiveness, profitability, war, construction industry, sun, social network theory, database, partnership, questionnaire, practitioner, adaptability, collaboration, population, methodology, foreign firm, critical success factor, China, competitive strategy, interview, knowledge sharing, profit, survey, construction firm, Shanghai, strategy, networking, social network, face |
| Subjects: | psychology, communication, economic analysis, knowledge management, energy systems, user focus, organization, data collection methods, strategic management, practitioner, control systems, sociology, demography, partnership management, market analysis, data management, industry analysis, research methods, management, conflict and crisis studies, Geography |
| Topics: | Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, International Construction, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here