Shebob, A; Dawood, N; Shah, R K and Xu, Q (2012) Comparative study of delay factors in Libyan and the UK construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 19(6), pp. 688-712. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - The aim of the research presented in this paper is to develop a new methodology for the comparative analysis and quantification of the impact of delay factors in construction projects. Design/methodology/approach - A framework of delay analysis system (DAS) is developed using the findings from the literature review and industry survey. Frequency and severity index method are used to identify and compare the delay factors in Libya and the UK. Statistical experiments are used to test the relationship and confidence level of survey results. A case study of a building project is used to evaluate the functions of the DAS. Findings - The survey illustrated that construction projects suffered more delays in Libya than the UK. The survey results indicated that critical delay factors are quite different in both countries. The case study found that a building project might be delayed by 41 to 46 days in Libya, or 34 to 38 days in the UK, when considering the most critical delay factors. Practical implications - The outcome of the study is expected to help policymakers, decision makers and others stakeholders within the construction industry to improve the industry's processes and reduce the impact of delay in the construction operations. Originality/value - This paper provides a new methodology and a delay analysis system that assists construction managers to analyse and quantify the impact of delay factors in building projects. The system is also expected to provide timely information about possible delays so that necessary measures can be taken to reduce the impact of delays and improve project delivery.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; delays analysis system; impact of delay factors; industry survey; Libya; operations management; quantification; United Kingdom |
| Index terms: | project delivery, severity index, construction industry, comparative study, construction operation, case study, quantification, Libya, operations management, construction manager, delay analysis, construction project, methodology, survey, comparative analysis, experiment, literature review, United Kingdom |
| Subjects: | management, research methods, production management, Geography, project controls, measurement and scaling, industry analysis, environmental hazards, data collection methods, profession, research design and methodology, construction operations, data analysis and analytics, project delivery |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Sustainability, Time Control, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here