Collins, F (2013) 2nd generation concrete construction: Carbon footprint accounting. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 20(4), pp. 330-344. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose – Construction contractors and facility managers are being challenged to minimize the carbon footprint. Life cycle carbon-equivalent (CO2-e) accounting, whereby the potential emissions of greenhouse gases due to energy expenditure during construction and subsequent occupation of built infrastructure, generally ceases at the end of the service life. However, following demolition, recycling of demolition waste that becomes incorporated into 2nd generation construction is seldom considered within the management of the carbon footprint. This paper aims to focus on built concrete infrastructure, particularly the ability of recycled concrete to chemically react with airborne CO2, thereby significantly influencing CO2-e estimates. Design/methodology/approach – CO2-e estimates were made in accordance with the methodology outlined in the Australian National Greenhouse Accounts (NGA) Factors and were based on the energy expended for each life cycle activity from audited records. Offsets to the CO2-e estimates were based on the documented ability of concrete to chemically react with airborne carbon dioxide (“carbonation”) and predictions of CO2 uptake by concrete and recycled concrete was made using existing predictive diffusion models. The author's study focused on a built concrete bridge which was demolished and recycled at the end of the service life, and the recycled concrete was utilized towards 2nd generation construction. The sensitivity of CO2-e and carbonation estimates were tested on several different types of source demolition waste as well as subsequent construction applications using recycled concrete (RCA). Whole-of-life CO2-e estimates, including carbonation of RCA over the 1st and 2nd generations, were estimated and contrasted with conventional carbon footprints that end at the conclusion of the 1st generation. Findings – Following demolition, CO2 capture by RCA is significant due to the more permeable nature of the crushed RCA compared with the original built infrastructure. RCA also has considerably greater exposed surface area, relative to volume, than a built concrete structure, and therefore more highly exposed surface to react with CO2 : it therefore carbonates more comprehensively. CO2-e estimates can be offset by as much as 55-65 per cent when including the contribution of carbonation of RCA built within 2nd generation infrastructure. Further offsets are achievable using blended fly ash or slag cement binders: however, this study has focused on concrete composed of 100 per cent OPC binders and the effects of RCA. Originality/value – Construction project estimates of life cycle CO2-e emissions should include 2nd generation applications that follow the demolition of the 1st generation infrastructure. Life cycle estimates generally end at the time of demolition. However, by incorporating the recycled concrete demolition waste into the construction of 2nd generation infrastructure, the estimated CO2-e is significantly offset during the 2nd generation life cycle by chemical uptake of CO2 (carbonation). This paper provides an approach towards inclusion of 2nd generation construction applications into whole-of-life estimates of CO2-e.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | carbon; carbon footprint; carbonation; concretes; construction materials; environmental management; life cycle; recycling |
| Index terms: | greenhouse gas, accounting, demolition waste, construction contractor, slag, methodology, construction project, concrete construction, occupation, carbon dioxide, manager, fly ash, concrete structure, concrete bridge, environmental management, estimate, construction material, life cycle, recycling, built infrastructure, service life, energy-expenditure, carbonation, carbon footprint |
| Subjects: | structural engineering, sustainability assessment, research methods, production management, sociology, asset management, building construction, infrastructure and transport systems, materials science, environmental impact, waste management, value management, practitioner, climate science, building materials, energy systems, economic analysis, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here