Deng, Y and Poon, S W (2013) Meeting sustainability challenges of mega-event flagships. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 20(1), pp. 46-62. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - A mega-event flagship (MEF) refers to a popular instrument developed for staging a mega-event and catalyzing area-based urban regeneration. Despite its lasting appeal and controversial nature, insufficient research on its critical early stage has been done to provide useful analysis. When the clients lack appropriate capabilities to confront sustainability challenges, MEFs may end up functioning poorly in the post-event era and even hindering the progress of intended renewals. The purpose of this study is to enhance MEF clients' capabilities in meeting sustainability challenges at the early stage and ultimately producing responsible MEFs of enduring worth. Design/methodology/approach - The multiple-case study method was adopted due to its widely recognized reliance on multiple sources to facilitate in-depth analyses. Data were collected through archival records, documentation, direct observation and participant observation. Findings - By proposing a comprehensive development framework based on the findings of multiple-case studies, this paper corrects a misunderstanding of such a development being an end in itself, and contributes new insights into the definitional early stage of MEFs. Social implications - The fact that MEFs are a global phenomenon as well as a local undertaking leads to a need to develop a database of useful lessons and critical decisions from previous MEFs, to establish a best practice targets system in future research. Originality/value - As an initial attempt, this paper lays the groundwork for research on MEFs by investigating how mega-event hosts have prepared in meeting its sustainability challenges.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | case study; development framework; mega-event flagship; sporting events; sustainability challenges; sustainable development |
| Index terms: | observation, best practice, sustainable development, renewal, documentation, methodology, direct observation, mega-event flagship, database, urban regeneration, sustainability challenge, case study |
| Subjects: | environmental issues, renovation and retrofit, post-disaster and reconstruction, data collection methods, health safety and environment, research methods, urban design, professional development, business, data management |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Research Practice, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Urban Studies, Business Strategy, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here