Jaeger, M and Adair, D (2013) Organisational culture of construction project managers in the GCC countries. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 20(5), pp. 461-473. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - One of the consequences of globalisation is the proliferation of interactions between professionals of organisations from different cultural backgrounds. This is certainly true for construction project managers working in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, and the aim here is to provide foundation evidence regarding first, the existence of a distinct organisational culture and, second, the perceived culture type. Design/methodology/approach - Data collected through questionnaire-based interviews with 96 construction project managers in the GCC countries was analysed by applying the Organisational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI, Cameron and Quinn, 2006) and empirical statistics. Findings - The OCAI was found to be a useful tool to determine a profession's culture, and, confirming what has so far been anecdotal evidence, the findings indicate that both the group and hierarchy cultures are dominant culture types among construction project managers in the GCC countries. Practical implications - The confirmation of the dominant culture types gives increased confidence to practitioners to develop effective cultural diversity management regarding professional interactions with construction project managers in the GCC countries. Originality/value - The findings contribute to the body of knowledge by proving that construction project managers in the GCC countries perceive a dominant blend of group and hierarchy cultures.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | gulf cooperation council; ocai; organisational culture; persian gulf states; project management |
| Index terms: | profession, project management, statistics, interaction, culture type, evidence, questionnaire, globalization, practitioner, construction project, methodology, organizational culture, Gulf cooperation council, body of knowledge, interview, manager |
| Subjects: | mathematical modelling, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, institututions, practitioner, institutional frameworks, knowledge management, research methods, project management theory and practice, production management, cross-cultural studies, sociology, economic factors, behavioral psychology |
| Topics: | Governance, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management, Information Management, Organizational Design, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here