Ochieng, E G; Price, A D F; Ruan, X; Egbu, C O and Moore, D (2013) The effect of cross-cultural uncertainty and complexity within multicultural construction teams. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 20(3), pp. 307-324. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine challenges faced by senior construction managers in managing cross-cultural complexity and uncertainty. The rationale was to identify the key strategies that are considered essential for managing cross-cultural complexity and uncertainty. Design/methodology/approach - Interviews with 20 senior construction managers, ten in Kenya and ten in the UK, were recorded, transcribed and entered into the qualitative research software NVivo. Validity and reliability were achieved by first assessing the plausibility in terms of already existing knowledge on some of the cultural issues raised by participants. The findings were presented to the participants through workshops and group discussions. Findings - The emerging key issues suggested that project leaders need to learn how to control their own characteristics and to use them selectively. An effective multicultural construction project team should focus on team output and attributes that characterise a multicultural team as a social entity. Practical implications - Findings indicate that the role of construction project managers has significantly changed over the past two decades. In order to deal with cross-cultural uncertainty, project leaders must have superior multicultural and interpersonal skills when managing global multicultural heavy engineering projects. Originality/value - The research shows that leaders of global construction project teams need a good understanding of their culture, environment and the value of their individual contributions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; cross-cultural management; cross-cultural uncertainty; cultural complexity; Kenya; multicultural integration; United Kingdom |
| Index terms: | manager, interview, United Kingdom, strategy, integration, qualitative research, methodology, construction project, construction manager, complexity, interpersonal skill, Kenya, construction project team, workshop, construction team, validity, global construction, construction industry, project team |
| Subjects: | organizational analysis, industry analysis, systems engineering, management, research methods, Geography, production management, project delivery, construction type, strategic management, profession, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, research design and methodology, human factors and perception, practitioner |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here