Swan, W; Ruddock, L and Smith, L (2013) Low carbon retrofit: Attitudes and readiness within the social housing sector. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 20(5), pp. 522-535. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - The study was designed to assess the attitudes, strategic readiness and drivers and barriers to the adoption of sustainable retrofit within the UK social housing sector. Design/methodology/approach - The study was undertaken using a structured questionnaire that was completed by 130 providers of social housing. Findings - The study showed that social housing providers were aware of the sustainable retrofit agenda, but with varying levels of strategic readiness. Immediate benefits to residents were seen as important drivers, as opposed to more remote issues such as climate change. The emerging nature of the sustainable retrofit market was seen as a major potential risk for residents. Research limitations/implications - The study represents a snap-shot of adoption and effectiveness issues, therefore does not show the trajectory of adoption which should be addressed in a follow-up study. Practical implications - The social housing sector has been viewed as a market maker for the sustainable retrofit market. The study shows the attitudes of the sector to this role. Social implications - The study has implications for the understanding social housing providers' engagement with the sustainable retrofit market to address fuel poverty and climate change. Social housing's role as market maker has implications for policies such as Green Deal and Energy Company Obligation. Originality/value - The study covers approximately 20 per cent of the social housing stock under management and gives a robust perspective of current views on adoption and effectiveness of retrofit technologies within the social housing sector. This is useful for both other social housing providers and policy makers.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | sustainable retrofit, social housing, strategy, drivers and barriers, housing, United Kingdom |
| Index terms: | low carbon, social housing, effectiveness, United Kingdom, strategy, green deal, fuel poverty, housing, climate change, methodology, questionnaire |
| Subjects: | climate science, construction type, data collection methods, energy systems, Geography, performance management, research methods, management, sustainability assessment, housing and residential development |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Urban Studies, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here