Tennant, S and Fernie, S (2013) Organizational learning in construction supply chains. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 20(1), pp. 83-98. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - Learning within the supply chain is widely considered to provide the basis for enhanced competitive advantage. The purpose of this paper is to explore the theory and current practice of organizational learning in UK construction supply chains. Design/methodology/approach - A qualitative research strategy is followed for this exploration of supply chain management and organizational learning. Research enquiry draws on semi-structured interviews with key construction supply chain stakeholders. The semi-structure interviews are recorded, transcribed and analysed via qualitative data analysis software. Findings - Careful examination of the transcripts reveal that whilst supply chain management practice in construction is limited, key schools of organizational learning are similarly underdeveloped. Findings disclose construction supply chain organizations routinely employ learning strategies that are best described as reactionary and interventionist. Research limitations/implications - Research was limited to the UK construction industry and represents the assessment and evaluation of construction clients and first-tier supply chain members working within construction framework agreements. The perspectives of construction SMEs were out with the data set. Practical implications - Underdeveloped organizational learning practices within supply chains present a significant barrier to the development and diffusion of supply chain management theory and practice in construction. In practical terms, the attainment of competitive advantage and the development of competing supply chain in construction would be extremely limited. Originality/value - Connecting organizational learning to the development and diffusion of supply chain management has been largely overlooked within the construction management literature. The research makes two notable contributions. First, the adaptation of a pragmatic and holistic organizational learning framework for the appraisal of learning strategies and second an evaluation of organizational learning in construction supply chains.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; organizational learning; performance; performance management; supply chain management; United Kingdom |
| Index terms: | appraisal, management practice, methodology, exploration, qualitative research, management theory, strategy, United Kingdom, organizational learning, interview, data analysis, construction industry, construction supply chain, construction client, adaptation, framework agreement, competitive advantage, performance management |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, environmental resource management, practitioner, construction logistics, user focus, research design and methodology, data collection methods, industry analysis, market analysis, professional development, Geography, research methods, factor and component analysis, performance measurement, management |
| Topics: | Procurement, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Information Management, Business Strategy, Quality Management, Supply Chain Management, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here