Tran, H and Carmichael, D G (2013) A contractor's classification of owner payment practices. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 20(1), pp. 29-45. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - A common distraction to contractors is that of cash management, and particularly incoming payments. In the extreme, a failure to manage a project's cash flows may bring about business failure. A contractor's financial viability rests on how actual payments from an owner are received. The purpose of this paper is to present a method for contractors to evaluate the punctuality and fullness of owner payments based on historical behaviour. Design/methodology/approach - Owners are classified according to their late and incomplete payment practices. The payment profile of an owner, in the form of aging payments received based on claims, is used as a basis for the method's development. Regression trees are constructed based on three predictor variables, namely, the average time to payment following a claim, the total amount ending up being paid within a certain period and the level of variability in claim response times. Findings - The method will be of interest to contractors concerned with managing their cash positions, as well as those persons looking at contractor-owner relationships. Practical implications - The method is intended to be used internally within a contractor's organisation to assist in decision making. The method can also be used by subcontractors, suppliers, and consultants. Owners may use the method reflectively to improve their own practices, to save time and cost by reducing disputes, and to develop better owner-contractor relationships. Originality/value - This paper represents an original approach, and an original contribution to contractor pre-tendering risk analysis practices, and an extension to contractor claim-payment analysis.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contractor payment; contractual claims; credit rating; owner classification; regression tree; risk; risk management; uncertainty |
| Index terms: | financial viability, owner, dispute, variability, risk management, business failure, cash flow, subcontractor, risk analysis, methodology, decision-making |
| Subjects: | research methods, financial management, statistical analysis, environmental hazards, decision analysis, sociology, practitioner, dispute resolution, risk assessment, economic analysis, business management |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Sustainability, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here