Chan, I Y S; Leung, M Y and Yuan, T (2014) Structural relationships between cultural values and coping behaviors of professionals in the stressful construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 21(2), pp. 133-151. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: Coping behaviors are a popular area of research in relation to construction professionals, who are often compelled to face a great deal of stress while striving for good performance in a dynamic and demanding industry. The effectiveness of various coping behaviors on stress and performance of construction professionals have long been identified. However, factors associating with individual adoption of various coping behaviors are still uncertain. People from different cultural environments have different values and hence different preferences for coping strategies, which have different effects on construction professionals. Hence, the papers' primary contribution to the overall body of knowledge is the establishment of statistical evidence that desired cultural values of construction professionals can influence their adoption of coping behaviors. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach - A questionnaire survey was designed and conducted to investigate the relationships between cultural values and coping behaviors of construction professionals in Hong Kong (HK). Surveys were distributed to 500 HK construction professionals by fax, e-mail, or personal contact. Of these, 139 were returned, giving a response rate of 28.0 percent. Based on the data collected, a series of systematic statistical analyses, including factor analyses, regression analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM), were conducted using SPSS 15.0 and Lisrel 8.5. Findings: Based on the results of factor analyses and regression analysis, a SEM was developed which reveals the following: first, interpersonal integration triggers planful problem solving; second, a disciplined work ethos triggers positive reappraisal and alleviates emotional discharge; and third, interpersonal integration triggers a disciplined work ethos. A series of personal-, interpersonal-, task-, and organizational-level recommendations are given on how to encourage construction stakeholders to adopt adaptive coping behaviors through cultivating their cultural values. Originality/value: The current study adopted a series of systematic analysis approaches to provide empirical support of how Chinese values of construction professionals predict their adoption of various coping behaviors in the dynamic and stressful industry. Since different coping behaviors have different impact on performance of construction professionals, the findings provide indications for future studies on enhancing performance through the cultivation of various cultural values and the coping behaviors they thereby adopt. 0969-9988.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction professionals; coping behaviours; cultural values; emotion-focused; problem-focused |
| Index terms: | problem solving, Hong Kong, preference, methodology, integration, coping, survey, construction industry, effectiveness, future study, e-mail, structural equation modelling, evidence, face, construction professional, statistical analysis, factor analysis, strategy, regression analysis, questionnaire, body of knowledge |
| Subjects: | performance management, management, research design and methodology, behavioral psychology, communication, data collection methods, professional development, psychology, evaluation and assessment methods, Geography, industry analysis, research methods, decision-making and reasoning, statistical analysis, knowledge management, data science, organizational analysis |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Quality Management, Information Management, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here