Critical success factors for implementation of risk assessment and management practices within the Tanzanian construction industry

Chileshe, N and Kikwasi, G J (2014) Critical success factors for implementation of risk assessment and management practices within the Tanzanian construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 21(3), pp. 291-319. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose - Despite the extensive research on critical success factors (CSFs), there is a paucity of studies that examine CSFs for the deployment of risk assessment and management processes in developing countries, particularly, Africa. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the perception of construction professionals on CSFs appertaining to the deployment of risk assessment and management practices (RAMP) in Tanzania with the aim of filling the knowledge gap. Design/methodology/approach - The primary data were collected from 67 construction professionals working with clients (private and public), consultants, and contractor organisations (foreign and local) within the Tanzanian construction. Response data was subjected to descriptive and inferential statistics with one-way analysis of variance to examine the differences in the perception of the identified CSFs. Findings - The descriptive and empirical analysis demonstrated a disparity of the ranking of the ten CSFs among the groups; however, the differences were not significant. Based on the overall sample, the results of the mean score ranking indicate that "awareness of risk management processes"; "team work and communications"; and "management style" were the three highly ranked CSFs whereas "co-operative culture"; "customer requirement"; and "positive human dynamics" were considered to be the least important. Research limitations/implications - The study did not differentiate the perceptions of the CSFs according to the ownership (local or foreign), and the sample consisted of organisations in one industry operating in Tanzania. Consequently, the findings may not generalise to other industries or to organisations operating in other countries. Practical implications - For RAMP to be implemented effectively, Tanzanian constructional-related organisations should consider the identified CSFs as a vehicle for improving project success through reduction of risk uncertainty. Furthermore, regardless of the type of organisation, "management style", "team work and communication" are necessary for the successful deployment of RAMP. Originality/value - This study makes a contribution to the body of knowledge on the subject within a previously unexplored context. The study provides insights on the drivers and enablers (CSFs) of risk assessment implementation across the Tanzania construction sector.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction industry; critical success factors; risk assessment; risk management; Tanzania
Index terms: body of knowledge, critical success factor, construction sector, management practice, methodology, developing country, implementation, construction industry, statistics, disparity, operative, construction professional, risk assessment, dynamics, ownership, risk management, variance, management style, project success, Tanzania, Africa, contractor organization
Subjects: organization, mathematical modelling, risk assessment, control systems, practitioner, regions and continents, contractual arrangements, knowledge management, economics, research methods, management, project management theory and practice, financial risk, development economics, professional development, Geography, measurement and scaling, social justice, systems engineering, industry analysis
Topics: Cost Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, International Construction, Human Resources, Ethics, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here